From 1df3456267c2e501a1252656c3a304b66773abe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: JosJuice Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:24:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] JitArm64: Remove a comment in dcbz implementation This implementation is pretty efficient in my opinion. And "As long as we aren't falling back to interpreter we're winning a lot" applies to basically every instruction to some degree anyway. --- Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp b/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp index f716229ebf..c5e3d7f6fa 100644 --- a/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp +++ b/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp @@ -641,9 +641,6 @@ void JitArm64::dcbz(UGeckoInstruction inst) } } - // We don't care about being /too/ terribly efficient here - // As long as we aren't falling back to interpreter we're winning a lot - BitSet32 gprs_to_push = gpr.GetCallerSavedUsed(); BitSet32 fprs_to_push = fpr.GetCallerSavedUsed(); gprs_to_push[DecodeReg(ARM64Reg::W0)] = 0;