Merge pull request #8027 from MerryMage/MOVAPS

Jit64: Prefer MOVAPS where possible
This commit is contained in:
Connor McLaughlin
2019-05-22 15:05:17 +10:00
committed by GitHub
2 changed files with 18 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -2180,7 +2180,11 @@ void XEmitter::MOVAPS(X64Reg regOp, const OpArg& arg)
}
void XEmitter::MOVAPD(X64Reg regOp, const OpArg& arg)
{
WriteSSEOp(0x66, sseMOVAPfromRM, regOp, arg);
// Prefer MOVAPS to MOVAPD as there is no reason to use MOVAPD over MOVAPS:
// - They have equivalent functionality.
// - There has never been a microarchitecture with separate single and double domains.
// - MOVAPD is one byte longer than MOVAPS.
MOVAPS(regOp, arg);
}
void XEmitter::MOVAPS(const OpArg& arg, X64Reg regOp)
{
@ -2188,7 +2192,7 @@ void XEmitter::MOVAPS(const OpArg& arg, X64Reg regOp)
}
void XEmitter::MOVAPD(const OpArg& arg, X64Reg regOp)
{
WriteSSEOp(0x66, sseMOVAPtoRM, regOp, arg);
MOVAPS(arg, regOp);
}
void XEmitter::MOVUPS(X64Reg regOp, const OpArg& arg)
@ -2425,8 +2429,14 @@ void XEmitter::MOVDDUP(X64Reg regOp, const OpArg& arg)
}
else
{
if (!arg.IsSimpleReg(regOp))
if (!arg.IsSimpleReg())
{
MOVSD(regOp, arg);
}
else if (regOp != arg.GetSimpleReg())
{
MOVAPD(regOp, arg);
}
UNPCKLPD(regOp, R(regOp));
}
}