piwalker/dolphin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dolphin-emu/dolphin.git synced 2025-07-25 23:29:44 -06:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Core: Make use of C++17 deduction guides with locks

Browse Source 
C++17 allows omitting the mutex type, which makes for both less reading
and more flexibility (e.g. The mutex type can change and all occurrences
don't need to be updated).
This commit is contained in:
Lioncash
2020-12-29 16:01:12 -05:00
parent 41316daf91
commit a8b0661fb0
23 changed files with 98 additions and 98 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
Source/Core/Core/ActionReplay.cpp
View File

@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ void ApplyCodes(const std::vector<ARCode>& codes)
if (!SConfig::GetInstance().bEnableCheats)
return;
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> guard(s_lock);
std::lock_guard guard(s_lock);
s_disable_logging = false;
s_active_codes.clear();
std::copy_if(codes.begin(), codes.end(), std::back_inserter(s_active_codes),
@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ std::vector<ARCode> ApplyAndReturnCodes(const std::vector<ARCode>& codes)
{
if (SConfig::GetInstance().bEnableCheats)
{
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> guard(s_lock);
std::lock_guard guard(s_lock);
s_disable_logging = false;
s_active_codes.clear();
std::copy_if(codes.begin(), codes.end(), std::back_inserter(s_active_codes),
@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void AddCode(ARCode code)
if (code.enabled)
{
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> guard(s_lock);
std::lock_guard guard(s_lock);
s_disable_logging = false;
s_active_codes.emplace_back(std::move(code));
}
@ -335,13 +335,13 @@ void EnableSelfLogging(bool enable)
std::vector<std::string> GetSelfLog()
{
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> guard(s_lock);
std::lock_guard guard(s_lock);
return s_internal_log;
}
void ClearSelfLog()
{
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> guard(s_lock);
std::lock_guard guard(s_lock);
s_internal_log.clear();
}
@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ void RunAllActive()
// If the mutex is idle then acquiring it should be cheap, fast mutexes
// are only atomic ops unless contested. It should be rare for this to
// be contested.
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> guard(s_lock);
std::lock_guard guard(s_lock);
s_active_codes.erase(std::remove_if(s_active_codes.begin(), s_active_codes.end(),
[](const ARCode& code) {
bool success = RunCodeLocked(code);