piwalker/dolphin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dolphin-emu/dolphin.git synced 2025-07-22 22:00:39 -06:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

replace DoFileSearch with optimized version

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Shawn Hoffman
2017-06-20 21:24:26 -07:00
parent f16599f4a8
commit c5fa470ad8
12 changed files with 97 additions and 34 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
Source/Core/DolphinWX/GameListCtrl.cpp
View File

@ -743,10 +743,9 @@ void GameListCtrl::RescanList()
const std::vector<std::string> search_extensions = {".gcm", ".tgc", ".iso", ".ciso", ".gcz",
".wbfs", ".wad", ".dol", ".elf"};
// TODO This could process paths iteratively as they are found
auto search_results = Common::DoFileSearch(search_extensions, SConfig::GetInstance().m_ISOFolder,
auto search_results = Common::DoFileSearch(SConfig::GetInstance().m_ISOFolder, search_extensions,
SConfig::GetInstance().m_RecursiveISOFolder);
// TODO rethink some good algorithms to use here
std::vector<std::string> cached_paths;
for (const auto& file : m_cached_files)
cached_paths.emplace_back(file->GetFileName());
@ -761,14 +760,8 @@ void GameListCtrl::RescanList()
cached_paths.cend(), std::back_inserter(new_paths));
const Core::TitleDatabase title_database;
// TODO we could store all paths and modification times to judge if file needs to be rescanned.
// If we cached paths that turned out to be invalid, this would save failing on them each time
// refresh is done.
// However if people e.g. set dolphin to recursively scan the root of their drive(s), then we
// would cache way too much data. Maybe just use an upper bound of invalid paths to cache?
// For now, only scan new_paths. This could cause false negatives (file actively being written),
// but otherwise
// should be fine.
// but otherwise should be fine.
for (const auto& path : removed_paths)
{
auto it = std::find_if(